These are unrelated novellas.

These Lifeless Things has two timelines. In one the Earth is taken over by Lovecraftian horrors and almost all humans are killed; this one is very effective and moving but stops rather than ends. This makes sense because it's a found document, but is still frustrating.

In the other timeline, it's a hundred years later, humanity has inexplicably recovered and has civilization again, the horrors are gone (OR ARE THEY), people don't seem to understand exactly what happened either during the invasion or afterward, and for no clear reason mostly don't believe the documents of it they do have. Grad students are researching the eldritch horror time; one has the found document, but the other grad students don't believe or care about it.

I didn't understand what was going on with the future plot or what its relevance was; maybe a commentary on how the past is hard to fathom and people deny reality? But the denial of reality is typically for political reasons, and there's no political reason I could figure out why people would overwhelmingly pretend an event that killed most of the population was something other than what it was, especially since there's no competing narrative of what did happen.



The Annual Migration of Clouds is much more successful. Reid is a young woman born after an apocalypse combining climate change and a hereditary, possibly sentient fungal disease. Her community lives in what used to be a university, eking out a hardscrabble and sometimes brutal existence that still allows for relationships, art, and trade. It's one of the most convincing depictions of a post-apocalyptic community I've seen - the opposite of the one-note dystopia.

Reid and her mother both have the fungus. Its effects are extremely variable, but two things are consistent: it controls your behavior to protect you/itself (by preventing you from doing dangerous things), and it often (maybe always?) eventually kills its host. I was very curious about this contradiction, which doesn't get addressed much but is probably an accidental side effect given that the fungus seems to want its hosts to survive. Mostly the fungus is important because of Reid's concerns over whether and how it's affecting her and her mother's free will.

The story begins when Reid receives a letter inviting her to join a fabled scientific domed community. The letter itself is of a technological level unachievable to her own people, but no one's ever come back from that dome or even seen it; does it really exist, or is it some kind of weird trick? If it is what it says it is, does she want to leave her own people to join a group that's hoarding knowledge rather than sharing it?

I will say upfront, so you're not disappointed or annoyed by where this novella stops, that the questions about the dome don't get answered, the entire action of the story is Reid making various preparations to leave while she tries to decide whether she's actually going to go, and the story ends when she makes her decision. The story itself is great and the ending is satisfying on an emotional level, but I really wanted more. I hope Mohamed expands this novella, because the world is fantastic.

Have any of you read anything by her? What did you think?

sovay: (I Claudius)

From: [personal profile] sovay


Or, even if it is, it seems like these days there is a lot of denial that doesn't feel very political or religious to me, such as anti-vaxers.

How is anti-vaxxing not political? It's full of conspiracy theories, appeals to a very particular definition of freedom, and highly charged as a badge of party affiliation.

From: [personal profile] thomasyan


Okay, I may be out of touch, and conflating types of anti-vaxing.

When I hear about people worried about their kids getting autism from vaccines, I feel some sympathy, but largely roll my eyes and try to think about something less depressing and infuriating.
sovay: (I Claudius)

From: [personal profile] sovay


Okay, I may be out of touch, and conflating types of anti-vaxing.

It's true that I was thinking of the COVID denialists, who built on the older foundation of anti-autism which crossed the political spectrum—thanks, broad appeal of eugenics, I guess.

From: [personal profile] thomasyan


Totally understandable. It is dismaying how widespread COVID-related denial is.

Plus, I need to retract my original statement. I've been mentally enumerating contemporary denials, and they ARE almost all political religious. The autism version was what first popped into my mind, and colored my thinking.

> full of conspiracy theories

Gah, so many versions of denial are mixed up with conspiracy theories.

So I'd think in the later timeline in "These Lifeless Things", that there would likely be conspiracists, and some *would* be interested in the documents, and/or claim the documents are some kind of coverup.

Thinking aloud: Could denying the Lovecraftian past be political in the way that climate change denial is political today? Those in power want everyone to think everything is fine, everything is under control, there's nothing to worry about. (While presumably they think they are rich and powerful enough to to be insulated from inconveniences, and will be able to escape minor catastrophes.)
.

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags