For the record, should I be murdered with a gun as is the fate of so many in America, I would like my death to be politicized immediately. Further, I would like the most graphic possible photos of my mutilated corpse to be publicized, made into flyers, and used to leaflet-bomb the homes of appropriate politicians and supreme court justices.
On the principle that the results you get are the results you want, I think there's a reason other than profit for the people encouraging the unhindered proliferation of guns in the US, and the more lethal and crowd-killing, the better. It's to terrorize people out of public gatherings and prevent the freedom of assembly.
All non-violent political change stems from public assembly; protests and demonstrations may be effective or not, depending on circumstances, but you cannot enact nonviolent political change when people cannot gather. So getting people scared to go out in public in groups is a great way to prevent political change.
It also has side benefits: destroying public education by making people afraid to send their kids to school and making it hard for kids to learn when their brainpower is getting sucked up by fear, funneling more and more money away from anything that benefits actual humans and toward the police (who won't stop the shootings, so that part won't be a problem), and of course creating more of a market for guns from people who think they need one to defend themselves, and so the circle of murder generates profit generates murder continues.
ETA: Jayland Walker drives while black and runs from cops; they shoot him 60 times. Robert Crimo murders 6 people, wounds 40, and runs from cops; they arrest him unarmed. Can't imagine white's different about them.
On the principle that the results you get are the results you want, I think there's a reason other than profit for the people encouraging the unhindered proliferation of guns in the US, and the more lethal and crowd-killing, the better. It's to terrorize people out of public gatherings and prevent the freedom of assembly.
All non-violent political change stems from public assembly; protests and demonstrations may be effective or not, depending on circumstances, but you cannot enact nonviolent political change when people cannot gather. So getting people scared to go out in public in groups is a great way to prevent political change.
It also has side benefits: destroying public education by making people afraid to send their kids to school and making it hard for kids to learn when their brainpower is getting sucked up by fear, funneling more and more money away from anything that benefits actual humans and toward the police (who won't stop the shootings, so that part won't be a problem), and of course creating more of a market for guns from people who think they need one to defend themselves, and so the circle of murder generates profit generates murder continues.
ETA: Jayland Walker drives while black and runs from cops; they shoot him 60 times. Robert Crimo murders 6 people, wounds 40, and runs from cops; they arrest him unarmed. Can't imagine white's different about them.
Tags: